TRADITIONAL JUROR TESTIMONY IN RESPONSE TO A OFFICIAL REVIEW OF JURY APPROACH TO NEW YORK POINT OUT
NAME: Shreya Shah
RECOGNIZED ADDRESS: Saint Peters Lutheran College, 66 Harts Street, Indooroopilly, Qld, 4068
COURT DOCKET NAME: The Supreme Court of New York State
TRIAL: Tough Case of Puerto Rican Youth
TIME AND DURATION OF SERVICE: on the lookout for July 1957, Duration of 4 hours
DATE OF COMPOSITION: 12 August 1957
The court system possibly the majority or perhaps unanimous method is a part of each of our Justice program. Recently, once present in a trial of fresh Puerto Rican youth charged of killing, it made an appearance that the unanimous jury was stronger and favourable. It was concluded as the much longer timeframe which the unanimous system in this case allowed the judgment of all jurors' in the decision making process which resulted in an affordable doubt. As well, it allowed the jurors' prejudice to affect all their judgement and acquired a reasonable chance to thoroughly re- examine the evidence. The comprehensive timeframe of the unanimous jury system, allowed the evidence offered in the courtroom to be carefully examined, specifically as the defence legal professional appeared lower than proactive. To begin, the accounts of the blade presented in court was disproved inside the jury room as the same knife was revealed by simply Juror 8. Thus it has become apparent it might have been " coincidence for another person to have stabbed the father with the same kind of knifeвЂќ (p. 17) that ended in a change in Juror Nines' vote. In the same way, Juror 8 raised an additional statement regarding the time it took the old guy witness to reach his door and see the boy, disguising a doubt in the jurors' thoughts, as " it's a extended walkвЂ¦. intended for an old person who had a strokeвЂќ (p. 34) which in turn modified the votes of Juror Two and Six. Correspondingly, most jurors right away started to re-think their ballots as evidence was little by little examined comprehensive. Allowing the evidence to process and the election count to change from " 11 to 1- guiltyвЂќ (p. 7) to reach a verdict...